
As you may have noticed, I removed the #1 spot on the 2010 list. I didn’t move everyone up a spot, because I feel like that would be unfair and it wasn’t my original intention for everyone to be a rank higher. So, that means there’s no #1 for 2010.
But let’s talk about why.
People have been throwing accusations around for a fairly long time that “Alexa” at Real Princess Diaries was actually not a sex worker and was lying about her/his identity. And you know what? I still enjoyed the site. So did a lot of other people. I don’t lie about who I am here, but my identity as “Rori” isn’t my whole identity, that’s for sure. I keep a lot private and yes, I’ve fictionalized some things about my sex life or relationships or past. I think most sex bloggers do.
So when people started coming to me with concerns that Alexa didn’t deserve the number one spot, I brushed it off. I hadn’t heard about this drama in the past. Hey, I’m not a detective and when a blog gets nominated for this list, if it isn’t in the last 10 posts or so, there’s a good chance that I won’t know about any accusations, drama, etc. going on associated with the blogger. Frankly, this isn’t some kind of professional list. I’m just a sex blogger who likes other sex bloggers, so I make an annual list of good ones that y’all should check out. In case you haven’t noticed, when there’s drama happening in this blogging niche, I’m very rarely around. I tend to stay out of things.
Anyway, back to the issue at hand…
I don’t care if you make up a fictional personality for your online site. Seriously, flat out lie to me if that makes you happy. I don’t really care. It’s just erotica and sex toy reviews and the like.
But I do care when there are very, very real accusations against you about underage interactions. This was something that NO ONE complaining about Alexa as #1 ever brought up to me (Unless it was in the huge list of links somewhere, written in a story at some point. I gave up on reading all the links people sent me.). Every referred to her/him as a fraud, content thief, etc…but sex sites involving children are a completely different story. That’s something that makes me sick to my stomach. Please note: if you did mention this in your email to me at some point yesterday, I’m sorry that I missed it. I recieved over 100 emails regarding not just Alexa but the list in general, so it’s entirely possible that I missed this information in someone’s email. For that I’m sorry.
And I’m a big believer of “innocent until proven guilty” – but it seems as though Alexa has taken Real Princess Diaries offline, with a statement that it will not be back…so that makes my job really easily. I don’t need to get to the bottom of this. You can’t be on my top sex bloggers list if you don’t have a sex blog.
Again, I know a lot of you are upset that “Alexa” isn’t a real person, but for me, that was never the issue. My list was about good writing, sites I enjoyed visiting, blogs I found entertaining. Me removing her as #1 is about something much deeper, something that was finally brought to my attention in combination with her removing her site, which is to me a statement that she doesn’t want to defend herself or tell her side of the story.
Also, I still fully stand behind what I posted yesterday as a response to the list fall out. 1) I don’t like to take sides when two people are giving different versions of the same story, especially when I don’t know either person. 2) I’m not going to move someone higher on the list because they update more often. 3) I don’t care if you’re more popular, this isn’t a popularity contest. 4) I respect your right to your own opinion. Please respect mine. Make your own list of top bloggers if you don’t agree with me – that only makes the community stronger!
But if you’ve reposted this list on your own site, please remove the #1 spot and link to this post instead. After a lot of soul-searching, I feel like it’s the right thing to do.
Feel free to discuss this in the comments below, but as always, please be respectful. Disagreeing is always ok. Name-calling is not.














